
What is the Gospel? This blog post contains one of the most remarkably helpful answers to this most vital question I have read. It is an academic yet accessible paper that was written by our guest contributor, my dad, Dr. R. Larry Overstreet.
What is the “Gospel”? Evaluating Current Statements by Biblical Evidence. A paper prepared for the Evangelical Theological Society, Baltimore, MD, 21 November 2013. By Dr. R. Larry Overstreet
The biblical word “gospel” is commonly used today in a broad sense, including such diverse topics as marriage, worship, theology, worldview, apologetics, history, Christian living, spiritual growth, and church and ministry.[1] To what extent has the term “gospel” lost its central focus when applied in such settings?
This paper surveys a variety of definitions of the “gospel,” and sets forth a biblical synthesis of the “gospel,” with a focus on the 76 times (79 in TR) the noun eujaggevlion (euaggelion) and the 54 times (55 in TR) the verb eujaggelivzw (euaggelizō) occur in the N.T. The paper then argues that we should be more precise in the use of the term “gospel,” and finally suggests how the term can be appropriately applied to our ministry of God’s Word.
I. DEFINITIONS OF “GOSPEL”
Reading the definitions of “gospel” in dictionaries provides an overview of some ways the term is used today.[2] Ignoring its definitions related to other areas, such as “something accepted as infallible truth” (e.g. his testimony was “gospel truth”) or “political gospel,” it was defined in 1963 as, “the good news concerning Christ, the kingdom of God, and salvation,” “one of the first four New Testament books telling of the life, death, and resurrection of Christ,” and “an interpretation of the Christian message.” Currently it is defined first as, “the teachings of Jesus and the apostles; the Christian revelation,” with other definitions including: “a doctrine maintained to be of great importance”; “black religious music”; “the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ.” The definition that seems to dominate the way many evangelicals today are using the term is that referring to the totality of teachings of Christ, the full Christian revelation of Scripture.
A. Definitions from Linkedin Members
As a member of the “linkedin.com” community, I posted this online discussion question on 18 July 2013, “What thoughts do you have concerning the current discussion on the question: what is the ‘gospel’?” I received 47 responses from 20 individuals,[3] with several responses of interaction among those who answered. Some of the answers were brief and others were lengthy. Some discussed issues about the gospel, without specifically defining it. A few simply quoted particular Scripture verses, such as, Romans 1:3-4, 16; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4; 2 Thessalonians 1:7-8; and 1 Peter 4:17 Others elaborated on the question. I have summarized major ideas concerning how the gospel is understood by the responders in the following listing.
1. The gospel is the means by which God forgives sins of Jew and Gentile through Christ’s cross and imparts Christ’s righteousness to believers.
2. The gospel includes the message of Jesus concerning the kingdom of God, and is a message for those who do not follow Jesus and a message for those who do follow Him; it is a message for the whole of one’s life and one’s relationship with the world in Christ.
3. The gospel is the good news of God’s salvation for humans, the instruction manual for saving our souls.
4. The gospel is for personal salvation, but in its outworking of personal conversion has a social implication of gaining justice in political and religious contexts.
5. The gospel is that the reign of God has come into this world in a liberating way through Jesus’ birth, life, ministry, death, resurrection, and return, and is relevant to believers’ lives and for the world.
6. The gospel is both personal and corporate. Unbelievers must respond as individuals in repentance and faith. Believers must have an allegiance to life in the corporate church, and demonstrate God’s kingdom laws and values through their lives in a fallen world. To this can be added the believer in the promised kingdom.
7. The gospel is the good news that Jesus overcame the enemy and made it possible for mankind to restore relationship with God.
8. The gospel of the kingdom and the gospel of salvation are the same, two sides of the same coin.
9. The gospel includes Christ’s virgin birth, sinless life, suffering, burial and resurrection, ascension, second coming, and judgment; Christ saves sinners through His vicarious death and condemns those who fail to accept Him as Lord and Savior.
10. The gospel is more a way of life than it is an historical text or teaching; it is an example to be lived—an example of change, love, challenge and celebration of God in our lives.
11. The gospel for the unsaved is that Jesus died and took my suffering on Himself, and He is alive to prove that. The gospel for the believer is that even though I may be persecuted for my belief I will inherit the kingdom of God.
Obviously, considerable difference of thought exists among these individuals concerning what the gospel is, what it contains (such as, whether or not the kingdom is included), and what its implications are. These, however, only scratch the surface of the discussion.
B. Definitions from “The Gospel Coalition”
Searching the website of “The Gospel Coalition” reveals that Trevin Wax, managing editor of The Gospel Project at Lifeway Christian Resources, compiled an extensive listing of “Gospel Definitions.”[4] He provides 7+ pages of definitions given by “Christians in the past,” including Gilbert Beebe (died 1881), F. F. Bruce (died 1990), Jeremiah Burroughs (died 1646), W. A. Criswell (died died 2002), C. H. Dodd (died 1973), Robert A. Guelich (died 1991), J. Hampton Keathley (died 2002), George Eldon Ladd (died 1982), Martin Luther (died 1546), M. F. Sadler (died 1895), Richard Sibbes (died 1635), William Tyndale (died 1536), and Zacharias Ursinus (died 1583). Those are followed by 20 pages of definitions provided by “Christians in the present,” including Danny Akin, Craig Bartholomew, Alistair Begg, Jim Belcher, Pope Benedict XVI, Michael Bird, John Blanchard, Lorraine Boettner,[5] Craig C. Broyles, Robert F. Capon,[6] D. A. Carson, Knox Chamberlin,[7] Andy Crouch, Mark Dever, David Dockery, Millard Erickson, Graeme Goldsworthy, Tim Keller, A. Boyd Luter, Jr., Rick McKinley, Scot McKnight, Mike Mercer, Josh Moody, Roger Nicole,[8] J. I. Packer, Darrin Patrick, Michael Patton, John Piper, Jeff Purswell, Chris Seay, R. C. Sproul, Ed Stetzer, Sam Storms, Tullian Tchividjian, Steve Timmis, Derek W. H. Thomas, Joe Thorn, Allen Wakabayashi, Derek Webb, Michael Wittmer, and N. T. Wright.
In addition to the definitions of the gospel by various individuals, dead and living, there are also listed organizational and corporate definitions. These include definitions from the doctrinal statement of the Antioch Network of Churches, The Gospel of Jesus Christ: An Evangelical Celebration, The Gospel Coalition, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, HeartCry Missionary Society, IVP Dictionary of the New Testament, Sovereign Grace Ministries, and Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia.
Along with these contributions to identifying the gospel, Trevin Wax, the compiler, advances his own definition of the gospel. He summarizes it in three headings.
The Gospel Proper (The Announcement)
The gospel is the Royal announcement that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, lived a perfect life in our place, died a substitutionary death on the cross for our sins, rose triumphantly from the grave to launch God’s new creation, and is now exalted as King of the world. This announcement calls for a response: repentance (mourning over and turning from our sin, trading our agendas for the kingdom agenda of Jesus Christ) and faith (trusting in Christ alone for salvation).
The Gospel’s Context (The Story of Scripture)
The Bible tells us about God’s creation of a good world which was subjected to futility because of human sin. God gave the Law to reveal His holiness and our need for a perfect sacrifice, which is provided by the death of Jesus Christ. This same Jesus will one day return to this earth to judge the living and the dead and thus renew all things. The gospel story is the Scriptural narrative that takes us from creation to new creation, climaxing with the death and resurrection of Jesus at the center.
The Gospel’s Purpose (The Community)
The gospel births the church. We are shaped by the gospel into the kind of people who herald the grace of God and spread the news of Jesus Christ. God has commissioned the church to be the community that embodies the message of the gospel. Through our corporate life together, we “obey the gospel” by living according to the truth of the message that Jesus Christ is Savior and Lord of the world.[9]
In a recent posting, Wax continues his interest in gospel definitions by highlighting Daniel Montgomery and Mike Cosper’s new book, Faithmapping. They also speak of the gospel in a threefold way: kingdom, cross, and grace. The gospel of the kingdom is “the good news that life with God under the rule of God is available to all who would turn from their rebellion and trust in King Jesus.”[10] The gospel of the cross is “the good news that through faith in Jesus’ perfect life, death for our sins, and victorious resurrection from the dead, we are justified and reconciled to God.”[11] The gospel of grace is “the good news of God’s wonderful acceptance of us not because we have earned it or deserve it but because he gives it to us freely at Christ’s expense.”[12] These two authors desire readers to embrace all these elements and proclaim the “whole” gospel:
The great temptation is to allow one aspect to overshadow or compete with the others. . . . The case we’re making is that the gospel is not simply a kingdom message or a cross message or a grace message—it’s all three. Our tendency, for a variety of reasons, is to splinter the message, to exalt one aspect over the others, and to diminish the scope and impact of the others. By doing this, it is we who suffer, missing out on the totality of the message of the gospel.[13]
Gospel definitions are abundant and varied. Some seek to remain close to explicit Scriptural declarations. Others seek to approach it more broadly. Some focus on Paul and others emphasize the teachings of Jesus. In order to arrive at a biblical understanding of the term “gospel,” we now turn to the way the Greek words are actually used in the N.T.
II. THE “GOSPEL” IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
A. Background of the Term
The Greek noun and verb referring to the “gospel” were both commonly used prior to the time of the N.T.[14] In its history, the noun referred to a reward for good tidings. For example, Homer (9th-8th century BC) recounts Odysseus saying, “And let me have a reward (eujaggevlion) for bearing good tidings.”[15] Aristophanes (ca. 448-380 BC) likewise used the term for the “sausage seller” who asserts that people “were prepared to crown me for my good news.”[16] In the LXX the word is used by David concerning his execution of the Amalekite who reported that he had killed Saul, which was “the reward I gave him for his news” (2 Sam. 4:10). That same meaning occasionally held even into N. T. times, since Plutarch (ca. AD 46-120) says that King Antigonus tells Aristodemus, “the reward (eujaggevlion) for thy good tidings thou shalt be some time in getting.”[17] By the time of the N.T. the majority of its uses, however, place the emphasis on the “good news” itself, rather than any reward gained from its telling. In the N.T. the word is never used of “reward for good news,”[18] but only of the good news itself.
Some scholars advocate that the emphasis of eujaggevlion in the N.T. derives from its use in the Roman imperial cult, focusing specifically on the reign of Augustus.[19] For example, his birthday was the beginning of joyful news for the world, he “is divine by nature,” he “works miracles and heals men,” he “is the savior of the world,” “the protective god of the state,” and brings “good fortune to the whole kingdom.”[20]
While those are similar parallels, the N.T. use appears rather to come more directly from the O.T. Martin argues cogently that the correct background of the N.T. concept of “gospel” comes from Isaiah. The Hebrew verb rc^B* (bawsar) occurs in 40:9; 52:7 (twice); 60:6; 61:1, and in each verse is translated in the LXX with eujaggelivzw. Martin explains his reasoning:
The influence of the Isaiah passages in later Judaism was considerable, especially at Qumrân (cf. 1 QM 18:14: “a messenger … of Thy goodness; that to the humble he might bring glad tidings of Thy great mercy, [proclaiming salvation],” G. Vermes, Dead Sea Scrolls in English [1962], p. 200) and among the rabbis, who used the [Hebrew] participle … for the herald of the messianic era of joy. The omission of the noun has caused some difficulty, but rather than conclude that early Christianity borrowed it from Greek usage, one might suggest that, with the precedent of the verb form the first Christians boldly appropriated a newly coined noun to express their conviction that the Jews’ eschatological expectation had indeed arrived in history with the advent, ministry, passion, and triumph of Israel’s messiah and the Church’s Lord.[21]
B. New Testament Use of Term
1. The noun eujaggevlion
The noun eujaggevlion is used in a variety of contexts, and with various verbs, and can be viewed from different perspectives.
a. Use of eujaggevlion with an object. The noun occurs with various objects; it is described as the gospel which concerns something in many contexts, but not all.
(1) The noun occurs in the following verses where no specific object is identified, though in some contexts one is implied: Matthew 26:13; Mark 1:15 (but “kingdom” is in the verse, and “God” is in v. 14); 8:35; 10:29; 13:10; 14:9; 16:15 (“long ending”); Acts 15:7; Romans 1:16; 10:16; 11:28; 1 Cor. 4:15; 9:14 [twice]; 9:18 [twice]; 9:23; 15:1; 2 Corinthians 8:18; Galatians 2:2; Ephesians 3:6; 6:19; Philippians 1:5, 7, 12, 17; 2:22; 4:3, 15; 1 Thessalonians 2:4; 2 Timothy 1:8, 10.
(2) The noun also occurs in contexts where a particular object is specified. These include the following:
(a) The gospel of the kingdom.
The noun appears specifically to refer to “the gospel of the kingdom,” toV eujaggevlion th~ basileiva” only in Matthew (Matt. 4:23; 9:35; 24:14). The concept of the gospel of the kingdom, however, does occur several other times in the four Gospels. While interpreters differ on the significance of this phrase, dispensationalists take these as genuine offers to Israel concerning the Mediatorial Kingdom.[22] This kingdom is distinct from the Church, and will be inaugurated at the Second Advent of Christ.
(b) The gospel of God: its origin.
The noun occurs with four slightly different phrases to incorporate the idea of the “gospel of God.” These include: eujaggevlion qeou,~ “gospel of God” (Rom 1:1); eujaggevlion tou~ qeou, “gospel of God” [“gospel of the God”] (Mark 1:14; Rom. 15:16; 1 Thess. 2:2, 8, 9); toV tou~ qeou~ eujaggevlion, “gospel of God” [“the of the God gospel”] (2 Cor. 11:7); and tw~/ tou~ qeou~ eujaggelivw,/ “gospel of God” [“the of the God gospel”] (1 Peter 4:17). The fact that this is the “gospel of God” “speaks of its ORIGIN [emphasis his]. It is God’s gospel. It was born in the heart and mind of the Father.”[23] Dunn concurs that “of God” asserts that God “is the source and authority behind the message.”[24]
(c) The gospel of Christ: its theme.
The noun also appears with four similar phrases detailing that this is the gospel of Christ: tou~ Cristou~, the gospel “of [the] Christ” (Rom 1:16, TR; 15:19; 15:29 TR; 1 Cor. 9:12, 18 TR; 2 Cor 2:12; 9:13; 10:14; Gal 1:7; Phil 1:27; 1 Thess. 3:2); jIhsou~ Cristou~ [uiJou~ qeou], the gospel “of Jesus Christ [Son of God]” (Mark 1:1); tou~ kurivou hJmw~n jIhsou~ [Cristou~], the gospel “of our Lord Jesus [Christ] (2 Thess. 1:8, TR includes Cristou~); tou~ uiJou~ aujtou,~~ gospel “of His Son” [“of the Son of Him”](Rom 1:9).
The specification that this is the “gospel of Christ,” God’s Son, emphasizes “the THEME [emphasis his] of the gospel, which is the Person and work of our glorious Kinsman-Redeemer.”[25]
(d) The glorious gospel: its majesty.
The noun occurs with two phrases emphasizing glory: eujaggevlion th~” dovxh” tou~ makarivou qeou~, “glorious gospel of the blessed God” [“gospel of the glory of the blessed God” (1 Tim. 1:11); eujaggelivou th~” dovxh” tou Cristou~, “gospel of the glory of Christ” (2 Cor. 4:4). “This title emphasizes the gospel’s intrinsic worth and majesty.”[26]
(e) The gospel of grace: its character.
The noun occurs in one instance with a specific connection to God’s grace: th~ cavrito” tou~ qeou~, gospel “of God’s grace” [“the grace of the God”] (Acts 20:24). “This title describes to us the CHARACTER [emphasis his] of the Evangel,”[27] its good news concerns God’s grace. Indeed, the “gospel itself discloses God’s grace to his people. . . . Salvation is God’s gift of grace, which the sinner appropriates in faith.”[28]
(f) The gospel of peace: its fruit.
The noun also occurs in one instance with a specific connection to peace: th~ eirhvnh,” gospel “of peace” (Eph 6:15). This phrase stresses that “peace is the FRUIT [emphasis his] of the gospel.”[29] Adding to this emphasis, Hoehner writes, “It is the believers’ ‘surefootedness’ in the tranquility of the mind and security of the heart in the gospel of peace that gives them readiness to stand against the devil and his angelic hosts.”[30]
(g) The gospel of salvation: its appropriation.
The noun further appears in one specific reference with a direct connection to the Greek work for salvation: th~ swthriva” uJmw~n, gospel “of our salvation” [“of the salvation of us”] (Eph. 1:13). “This title speaks of the individual APPROPRIATION [emphasis his] that must be made;”[31] when the gospel is appropriated into the life, salvation is obtained.
(h) The gospel of truth: its reliability.
In three references the noun is used with the emphasis on truth: hJ ajlhvqeia tou~ eujaggelivou, “the truth of the gospel” (Gal 2:5); thVn ajlhvqeian tou~ eujaggelivou, “the truth of the gospel” (Gal. 2:14) ; th~” ajlhqeiva” tou~ eujaggelivou, “the truth of the gospel” (Col. 1:5).
This description stresses the true teaching of the gospel, that it is completely trustworthy and reliable, “as contrasted with any perversion of it by the admixture of a foreign element, such as Jewish law . . . or Gentile philosophy.”[32] Moo expands on this point, “In the Old Testament, ‘truth’ often involves the idea of reliability and authenticity, and this meaning carries over to the New Testament. A ‘word of truth,’ then, is a word, or message, that can be relied upon.”[33]
(i) The gospel of hope: its anticipation.
Paul concretely refers to the gospel as that of hope: th~ ejlpivdo” tou~ eujaggelivou, “the hope of the gospel” (Col. 1:23). This phrase emphasizes “the hope given by or proclaimed in the gospel.”[34] Believers have a confident expectation of eternal salvation because of accepting the gospel.
(j) The gospel’s teaching: faith.
Paul exhorts the Philippians to let their manner of life exemplify the gospel, and in that process he exhorts them to strive for th/~ pivstei tou~ eujaggelivou, “the faith of the gospel” (Phil. 1:27). In this context the “faith” refers to the entire body of Christian doctrine “‘which is appropriate to the gospel,’ or ‘the faith which is based on the gospel.’”[35] The teaching to which Paul refers is not the gospel itself, but it is that which is built upon the foundation of the gospel. After people trust the gospel, then they need to grow in the faith.
(k) The gospel’s effect: suffering.
While we often focus on the benefits of salvation which result from the gospel as in (g) above, another effect can equally occur: toi~ desmoi~ tou~ eujaggelivou, “the bonds of the gospel” (Phm. 13). The gospel was the cause of Paul’s “imprisonment since it had resulted from the preaching of the gospel.”[36] This, however, never made Paul quit sharing the gospel.
(l) The everlasting gospel: its permanence.
One time in the N.T. the gospel is characterized as being everlasting in its character: eujaggevlion aijwvnion, “gospel everlasting” (Rev. 14:6). It was planned by God before the world began, and continues to be proclaimed through the ages. “It should be no surprise that angels see to it that it [the gospel] is proclaimed in the darkest hour of persecution in the world’s history.”[37]
(m) The gospel: its counterfeit.
Paul warned both the Galatians and the Corinthians of counterfeits: e{teron eujaggevlion, “of another kind of gospel” (Gal. 1:6); eujaggevlion e{teron, “gospel of another kind” (2 Cor. 11:4). Any so-called gospel that deviates from the true gospel of God must be avoided. “There cannot be a . . . a message of good news different in kind from that which Paul preached, and different in an evil sense, and yet be a message of good news. A salvation-by-works message is no good news to a lost sinner.”[38]
b. Use of eujaggevlion with various verbs. The noun is used in the N.T. with various verbs, emphasizing different ways in which it is presented. The ten different verbs are:
(1) eujaggevlion is used with the verb eujaggelivzw, “to preach (the gospel)” (1 Cor. 9:18; 15:1; 2 Cor. 11:7; Gal. 1:11; Rev. 14:6);
(2) eujaggevlion is used with the verb khruvssw, “to preach it as a herald” (Matt. 4:23; 24:14; 26:13; Mark 1:14; 13:10; 14:9; 16:15; 2 Cor. 11:4; Gal 2:2; Col. 1:23; 1 Thess. 2:9);
(3) eujaggevlion is used with the verb lalevw, “to speak” (Matt. 26:13; Mark 14:9; 1 Thess. 2:2, 4);
(4) eujaggevlion is used with the verb diamartuvromai, “to testify earnestly” (Acts 20:24);
(5) eujaggevlion is used with the verb kataggevlw, “to proclaim” (1 Cor. 9:14);
(6) eujaggevlion is used with the verb douleuvw (and the preposition eij”), “to serve unto, with” (Phil. 2:22);
(7) eujaggevlion is used with the verb sunaqlevvw, “to labor with, to strive together” (Phil. 1:27; 4:3);
(8) eujaggevlion is used with the verb iJerourgevw, “to minister as a priest” (Rom 15:16);
(9) eujaggevlion is used with the verb plhrovw, “to fulfill completely” (Rom 15:19);
(10) eujaggevlion is used with the verb sugkakopaqevw, “to suffer hardship with” (2 Tim 1:8).
c. Use of eujaggevlion showing its reception. How people responded to the gospel is also demonstrated in many N.T. texts, but not in all.
The various occurrences of the noun where the gospel is proclaimed, but the reception is not specifically identified (although implied responses may be found) include: Matthew 4:23; 9:35; 24:14; 26:13; Mark 1:14; 8:35; 10:29; 13:10; 14:9; Acts 20:24; Romans 1:1, 9; 2:16; 11:28; 15:16, 19; 16:25; 1 Corinthians 4:15; 9:14, 23; 15:1; 2 Corinthians 2:12; 4:3-4; 8:18; 9:13; 10:14; 11:7; Galatians 1:6, 11; 2:5, 7, 14; Ephesians 3:6; 6:15, 19; Philippians 1:5, 7, 12, 17, 27; 2:22; 4:3, 15; Colossians 1:5, 23; 1 Thessalonians 1:5; 2:2, 8, 9; 3:2; 2 Thessalonians 2:14; 2 Timothy 1:8, 10; 2:8; Philemon 13; 1 Peter 4:17; Revelation 14:6.
In many contexts, however, the noun is used with seven particular verbs (two are in one verse) which do indicate the type of reception given to the gospel. These include:
(1) eujaggevlion is used with the verb devcomai, “to receive, accept” (2 Cor. 11:4);
(2) eujaggevlion is used with the verb paralambavnw, “to receive to oneself” and also
with the verb i{sthmi, “to stand” (1 Cor. 15:1);
(3) eujaggevlion is used with the verb uJpakouvw, “to hearken to, or obey” (Rom. 10:16); 2 Thess. 1:8);
(4) eujaggevlion is used with the verb pisteuvw, “to believe” (Mark 1:15; 15:15-16; Acts 15:7; Rom. 1:16; 10:16; Gal. 2:2; Eph. 1:13; 1 Thess. 2:4; 1 Tim. 1:11);
(5) eujaggevlion is used with the verb metastrevfw, “to change, pervert” (Gal. 1:7);
(6) eujaggevlion is used with the verb tivqhmi, “to place, offer” (1 Cor. 9:18).
2. The Verb eujaggelivzw
a. Its definition. The verb eujaggelivzw generally means to “bring good news, announce good news,” and specifically means to “proclaim the divine message of salvation.”[39]
b. Its use. The verb occurs in the active, middle, and passive voices, and is used in particular ways in each of those.
(1) In the active voice it occurs in two verses, with two emphases. It stresses (a) the persons to whom the proclamation of good news is made: God’s servants, the prophets (Rev. 10:7), and those living on earth (Rev. 14:6). In those same verses, it refers (b) to the message proclaimed as the finished mystery of God (Rev. 10:7), and the everlasting gospel (Rev. 14:6).
(2) In the passive voice it occurs in eight verses, with the same two emphases as in the active voice.
(a) It stresses the persons to whom the proclamation of good news is made: the poor (Matt. 11:5; Luke 7:22), the writer and readers of Hebrews (Heb 4:2), O. T. Jews (Heb. 4:6), and those now dead (1 Peter 4:6).
(b) The verb also refers to the message proclaimed as: the kingdom of God” (Luke 16:16), that received through revelation (Gal. 1:11), and the word of the Lord (1 Peter 1:25).
(3) The middle voice occurs most frequently. It appears 48 times in 46 verses, and is used with three emphases.
(a) It is used, first, with the emphasis on the person preached as the content of the gospel message. That person is: Christ Jesus (Acts 5:42), the Lord Jesus (Acts 11:20), the living God (Acts 14:15), Jesus and His resurrection (Acts 17:18), and God’s Son (Gal 1:16).
(b) It is used, second, with the emphasis on the persons evangelized. These are referred to as: the people (Luke 3:18; 20:1), the poor (Luke 4:18; 7:22), the towns (Luke 9:6), Samaritan villages (Acts 8:25), Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8:35), all coastal cities (Acts 8:40), cities of Lycaonia (Acts 14:7), Derbe (Acts 14:21), Macedonia (Acts 16:10), Rome (Rom. 1:15), places where Christ was not preached before (Rom. 15:20), Corinth—implied (1 Cor. 9:16, twice), Corinth (1 Cor. 15:1), regions beyond (2 Cor. 10:16), Corinth (2 Cor. 11:7), Galatia (Gal. 1:8; 4:13), and readers in 5 provinces in Asia (1 Pet. 1:12).
(c) It is used, third, concerning its content. Within the preaching of good news are included the following subjects: Mary’s conception (Luke 1:19), joy at Jesus’ birth (Luke 2:10), the kingdom of God (Luke 4:43; 8:1; Acts 8:12), the word (Acts 8:4), peace (Acts 10:36; Eph. 2:17), promise to the fathers (Acts 13:32), the word of the Lord (Acts 15:35), good things (Rom. 10:15), the cross (1 Cor. 1:17), without charge (1 Cor. 9:18), the gospel (1 Cor. 15:1, 2; 2 Cor. 11:7), false gospel contrasted to true gospel (Gal. 1:8, twice; 1:9), the faith (Gal 1:23), the unsearchable riches of Christ (Eph 3:8), and good news of Thessalonians’ faith and love (1 Thess. 3:6).
III. IDENTIFYING THE GOSPEL
On the basis of the foregoing biblical synthesis of the noun eujaggevlion and the verb eujaggelivzw, particular observations may be made. Examining the totality of usages reveals no instance in which the term is used biblically to refer to such things as marriage, worship, theology, worldview, apologetics, history, Christian living, or spiritual growth. Even things related to church and ministry are not specifically integral to the gospel. Yes, all of those things are impacted when a person truly believes the gospel, and when a church faithfully proclaims the gospel, but they are not an inherent part of that gospel. Goldsworthy correctly observes:
It cannot be stressed too much that to confuse the gospel with certain important things that go hand-in-hand with it is to invite theological, hermeneutical and spiritual confusion. Such ingredients of preaching and teaching that we might want to link with the gospel would include the need for the gospel (sin and judgment), the means of receiving the benefits of the gospel (faith and repentance), the results or fruit of the gospel (regeneration, conversion, sanctification, glorification) and the results of rejecting it (wrath, judgment, hell). These, however we define and proclaim them, are not in themselves the gospel. If something is not what God did in and through the historical Jesus 2000 years ago, it is not the gospel. Thus Christians cannot “live the gospel,” as they are often exhorted to do. They can only believe it, proclaim it and seek to live consistently with it. Only Jesus lived (and died) the gospel. It is a once-for-all finished and perfect event done for us by another.[40]
Next, although there are clear references to the “gospel of the kingdom,” they cluster in the Synoptic Gospels. The precise phrase “the gospel of the kingdom” only occurs three times, all in Matthew (4:23; 9:35; 24:14). However, other verses include the kingdom along with the gospel, such as when John the Baptist preached, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15). In Luke 16:16, “the kingdom of God is preached” (with the verb eujaggelivzw; see also Luke 4:43; 8:1; Acts 8:12). The “gospel” (Mark 10:29) is also connected with the “age to come” (10:30). Some scholars believe that the “gospel of the kingdom” and the gospel which Paul preached are identical, and all references to the “gospel” (wherever found in the N.T.) are directly applicable to the church age in which we now live. Dispensationalists see a distinction between them. They identify the “gospel of the kingdom” with the message of the Mediatorial Kingdom which Israel could have experienced if the nation had received Christ at His first advent, which is the same kingdom referred to as the Millennium. In contrast, the current “gospel” being preached is that which is defined by the apostle Paul.
While the “gospel” is identified in various ways in the N.T. (as seen above), it is only specifically defined by Paul. In Romans 1, he summarizes the gospel, “Paul, a bond-servant of Christ Jesus, called as an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh, who was declared the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead, according to the Spirit of holiness, Jesus Christ our Lord” (1:1-4). In 1Corinthians 15:1-5, however, he provides his most complete definition: “Now I make known to you, brethren, the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received, in which also you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast the word which I preached to you, unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.”
The content of the “gospel” is here clearly identified, and this description correlates well with the preached content of the gospel in all of its other occurrences in the N.T.
The “gospel” contains three essential elements. Paul asserts, first, that the gospel message is “that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures.” The fact is that Christ died with a specific purpose in view: “for our sins.” This phrase “is a direct reflection of the LXX of Isa. 53,”[41] which uses the plural “our sins” in 53:4, 5, 6 and “for sins” in 53:10. While the LXX uses the preposition periv and Paul uses uJpevr Fee observes that “these two have become nearly interchangeable in koinē.[42] This is clearly the language of Christ’s substitutionary atonement. When Paul said this was “according to the Scriptures,” he may have simply had the totality of Old Testament Scripture in view. Or, he may have been thinking of some specific texts in addition to Isaiah 53, such as, Psalm 16:10; 22:15; Daniel 9:26; Zechariah 12:10.
Paul states, second, that Christ “was buried.” This confirms the fact that He truly died. “The mention of the burial presupposes an empty tomb after the resurrection, because by definition ‘resurrection’ meant a new body that did not leave a corpse behind; Paul’s Palestinian Jewish sources could have meant the term no other way.”[43]
Paul affirms, finally, that Christ “was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures.” The verb “raised” is in the perfect tense, stressing a past event and which also “lays stress on the continuing results and efficacy of Christ’s Resurrection.”[44] Paul again declares that this is “according to the Scriptures.” As in the earlier use of this phrase, he may have been thinking of the O.T. as a whole. Or, he may have been thinking of such texts as Psalm 16 and Isaiah 53 for the truth of the resurrection, and such texts as Hosea 6:2; Jonah 1:17 (cf. Matt. 12:39-40) for the assertion of “on the third day.” Romans 4:24-25 also speak to the critical nature of Christ’s resurrection: “but for our sake also, to whom it will be credited, as those who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead, He who was delivered over because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification.”
CONCLUSION: MINISTRY OF THE GOSPEL
The N.T. exhorts us to proclaim the gospel. But, to proclaim it correctly is essential. The gospel message we share with a needy world centers in the saving work of Jesus Christ. He is the one who died for our sins. He is the one who was buried. He is the one who rose again. He is the one who did all that to accomplish the fullness of our salvation. We preach the now living Christ. Our task is to present Him in the gospel truth of His death, burial and resurrection, so that sinful people may call upon Him and trust in Him for their eternal destiny.
Yes, we are concerned about marriage, worship, theology, worldview, apologetics, history, Christian living, spiritual growth, and church and ministry. Yes, the Scriptures speak to those subjects, and many others. Those people who have trusted Christ, and received the benefit of His gospel, are called to live for His glory, and to demonstrate His character. That is part of Christian growth and maturity. That, however, is not the “gospel,” and when we apply the word in those broad areas, it causes us to lose the central focus of the gospel itself.
Footnotes
[1] A perusal of “The Gospel Coalition” website demonstrates that the coalition’s emphases include all these subjects, and more. See http://thegospelcoalition.org.
[2] The following examples are taken from Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield: G. & C. Merriam, 1963), 361, and from “Gospel,” http://dictionary.reference.com. Accessed 11 September 2013.
[3] These responders were: a ministry worker in North Carolina, Church of God in Christ administrator in Wisconsin, church minister in England, Web designer in Minnesota, pastor in Arizona, associate United Pentecostal pastor in Ontario, Canada, an independent Catholic chaplain in Wisconsin, former pastor in Washington, missionary Bible college president in Ethiopia, Pentecostal pastor in Ghana, college professor in Scotland, international ministry consultant in Colorado, president of a media production co. in Indiana, director of a faith based non-profit in Kentucky, college professor in Michigan, university professor in Georgia, college professor in Wales, graduate student in Colorado, Baptist pastor in Massachusetts, and a Roman Catholic priest in Illinois.
[4] A 33 page pdf file of these definitions, last updated September 2012, can be found at: http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2009/09/14/gospel-definitions-2. Accessed 11 September 2013.
[5] Boettner died in 1990, so he should be listed in the previous category.
[6] Capon died 5 September 2013.
[7] Chamblin died 7 February 2012.
[8] Nicole died 11 December 2010.
[9] http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevinwax/2009/09/14/gospel-definitions-2.
[10] Daniel Montgomery and Mike Cosper, Faithmapping: a Gospel Atlas for Your Spiritual Journey (Crossway, 2013), 43.
[11] Ibid, 67.
[12] Ibid, 85.
[13] Ibid, 90.
[14] For discussion of the terms, including their history, see such sources as: LSJ, 704-05; TDNT, 2:707-37, and BDAG, 402-03.
[15] Homer, Odyssey, 14.152. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu. Accessed 13 September 2013.
[16] Aristophanes, Equites 647. http://www.richerresourcespublications.com. Accessed 13 September 2013.
[17] Plutarch, Demetrius, 17.5. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu. Accessed 13 September 2013.
[18] TDNT, 2:725.
[19] G. Strecker, “eujaggevlion,” Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament, eds. Horst Balz and Gerhard Schneider (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981), 2:71.
[20] TDNT, 2:724.
[21] R. P. Martin, “Gospel” The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, rev. ed., gen. ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982), 2:529-30.
[22] See Alva J. McClain, The Greatness of the Kingdom (Winona Lake: BMH, 2001), 259-384.
[23] James A. Stewart, Evangelism Without Apology (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1960), 24.
[24] James D. G. Dunn, Romans 1-8, Word Biblical Commentary, vol. 38 (Dallas: Word, 1988), 10.
[25] Ibid, 25.
[26] R. Alan Streett, The Effective Invitation (Old Tappan: Revell, 1984), 31.
[27] Stewart, Evangelism, 26.
[28] Simon J. Kistemaker, Exposition of the Acts of the Apostles, New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1990), 730.
[29] Streett, Invitation, 32.
[30] Harold W. Hoehner, Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2002), 844.
[31] Ibid, 33.
[32] C. F. Hogg and W. E. Vine, The Epistle to the Galatians, 1921 (Fincastle: Scripture Truth, n.d.), 65.
[33] Douglas J. Moo, The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008), 87.
[34] A. S. Peake, “Colossians,” The Expositor’s Greek Testament, ed. W. Robertson Nicoll (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, rpt. 1967), 513.
[35] I-Jin Loh and E. A. Nida, A Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Philippians, UBS Handbook Series, electronic database (Seattle: Biblesoft, 2006).
[36] Peter T. O’Brien, Colossians, Philemon, Word Biblical Commentary, vol. 44, gen. eds. David A. Hubbard and Glenn W. Barker (Waco: Word, 1982), 294.
[37] Stewart Custer, From Patmos to Paradise: A Commentary on Revelation (Greenville: BJU Press, 2004), 159.
[38] Kenneth S. Wuest, “Galatians,” Word Studies from the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972), 37.
[39] BDAG, 402.
[40] Graeme Goldsworthy, Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics: Foundations and Principles of Evangelical Biblical Interpretation (Downers Grove: IVP, 2006), 58-59.
[41] Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, The New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 724.
[42] Ibid, 724, ftn. 55.
[43] Craig S. Keener, “1 Corinthians,” IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament (Downers Grove: IVP, 1993), 484.
[44] W. E. Vine, 1 Corinthians: Local Church Problems (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1965), 204.







Most of us (assuming an audience which holds the “symbolic” view of communion) have observed communion primarily in corporate gatherings, with a short message and Bible reading from the pastor, followed by a collective ingesting of a wafer and a small plastic cup of grape juice. Let me say, I have no problem with the wafer and grape juice! Observing communion in this way has been a major part of my life’s spiritual formation. But I propose that small group members should observe communion together at least once per semester/term.
FROM PAGES 19-21 – THE BREAD:




